<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timeline: Rock Art vs. Monster Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy</link>
	<description>Craft Beer News Updated Daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eat More Kale- at Three Penny! &#124; Three Penny Taproom Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-83972</link>
		<dc:creator>Eat More Kale- at Three Penny! &#124; Three Penny Taproom Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-83972</guid>
		<description>[...] Rock Art&#8217;s Vermonster when they found themselves in a fairly similar legal battle with a corporate giant selling a completely different product, we&#8217;re quite proud to be supporting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rock Art&#8217;s Vermonster when they found themselves in a fairly similar legal battle with a corporate giant selling a completely different product, we&#8217;re quite proud to be supporting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: They&#8217;ve Created A Monster! Trademark lawyers take note. &#124; Heavy Targets</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-48861</link>
		<dc:creator>They&#8217;ve Created A Monster! Trademark lawyers take note. &#124; Heavy Targets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-48861</guid>
		<description>[...] BeerNews and A Good Beer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BeerNews and A Good Beer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beersage</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-21311</link>
		<dc:creator>beersage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-21311</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while. From what I remember, it seemed frivolous at the time.  If it was an energy drink they were going after, it&#039;d make more sense but there are so many brands that put Monster in their name. The fact that it is liquid beverage here makes Rock Art more of a target I suppose. I just don&#039;t think a future defendant could argue that they didn&#039;t go after Rock Art for Vermonster because it&#039;s a different-enough name and they sell to different/non-competing consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while. From what I remember, it seemed frivolous at the time.  If it was an energy drink they were going after, it&#8217;d make more sense but there are so many brands that put Monster in their name. The fact that it is liquid beverage here makes Rock Art more of a target I suppose. I just don&#8217;t think a future defendant could argue that they didn&#8217;t go after Rock Art for Vermonster because it&#8217;s a different-enough name and they sell to different/non-competing consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galvani Legal</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-21280</link>
		<dc:creator>Galvani Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-21280</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to defend mega-corp Hansen, but do understand that they must monitor use - or suspected use - of their mark.  Vermonster probably never really threatened Hansen&#039;s trademark, but Hansen wasn&#039;t completely wrong in flexing its muscle a little.  I explain more here: http://www.galvanilegal.com/blog/vermonster-v-monster/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to defend mega-corp Hansen, but do understand that they must monitor use &#8211; or suspected use &#8211; of their mark.  Vermonster probably never really threatened Hansen&#8217;s trademark, but Hansen wasn&#8217;t completely wrong in flexing its muscle a little.  I explain more here: <a href="http://www.galvanilegal.com/blog/vermonster-v-monster/" rel="nofollow">http://www.galvanilegal.com/blog/vermonster-v-monster/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intellectual property blog &#124; galvani legal llc &#124; phoenix, arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-14909</link>
		<dc:creator>intellectual property blog &#124; galvani legal llc &#124; phoenix, arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-14909</guid>
		<description>[...] an article a little while ago about the power of social networking in a pre-litigation scenario.  Beernews.org put out an article about a cease-and-desist letter that Hansen, owner of the MONSTER trademark, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an article a little while ago about the power of social networking in a pre-litigation scenario.  Beernews.org put out an article about a cease-and-desist letter that Hansen, owner of the MONSTER trademark, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craft Beer 2009 Year in Review: the Top 10 Stories &#124; Beernews.org</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-10157</link>
		<dc:creator>Craft Beer 2009 Year in Review: the Top 10 Stories &#124; Beernews.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-10157</guid>
		<description>[...] Rock Art Brewery was sent a cease-and-desist notice from representatives of Hansen Beverage, makers of Monster Energy Drink. Its Vermonster beer would have to be renamed to something else because the name allegedly resembled that of Monster Energy Drink. Rather than lay down to the corporate behemoth, the company fought back using a viral social media campaign as its main weapon. Hansen and Rock Art would later reach an agreement and Vermonster is here to stay. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rock Art Brewery was sent a cease-and-desist notice from representatives of Hansen Beverage, makers of Monster Energy Drink. Its Vermonster beer would have to be renamed to something else because the name allegedly resembled that of Monster Energy Drink. Rather than lay down to the corporate behemoth, the company fought back using a viral social media campaign as its main weapon. Hansen and Rock Art would later reach an agreement and Vermonster is here to stay. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F*#$ing Corporate Lawyers! &#171; drewtabke.com</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-8279</link>
		<dc:creator>F*#$ing Corporate Lawyers! &#171; drewtabke.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-8279</guid>
		<description>[...] Monster Energy Drink (Hansen&#8217;s Beverage Company) threatens small Vermont brewery with legal action over their &#8220;Vermonster&#8221; beer. (link) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monster Energy Drink (Hansen&#8217;s Beverage Company) threatens small Vermont brewery with legal action over their &#8220;Vermonster&#8221; beer. (link) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LT Saloon&#160;&#124;&#160; Ye Olde Scribe&#8217;s Bad Beer Report</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-8138</link>
		<dc:creator>LT Saloon&#160;&#124;&#160; Ye Olde Scribe&#8217;s Bad Beer Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-8138</guid>
		<description>[...] expecting more blow back than a champagne bottle of homebrew with over 30 carb tabs in it:  (Morrisville, VT) – The stream of support for Rock Art Brewery continues on Twitter today as over 3,000 tweets have poured in over the last 30 hours. All [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expecting more blow back than a champagne bottle of homebrew with over 30 carb tabs in it:  (Morrisville, VT) – The stream of support for Rock Art Brewery continues on Twitter today as over 3,000 tweets have poured in over the last 30 hours. All [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beersage</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator>beersage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-7774</guid>
		<description>Nice work, man. Is 20k at the end of next week too bold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, man. Is 20k at the end of next week too bold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Payette</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7773</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Payette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-7773</guid>
		<description>Over 10,000 now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 10,000 now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monster vs Vermonster &#124; BrewBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7767</link>
		<dc:creator>Monster vs Vermonster &#124; BrewBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-7767</guid>
		<description>[...] Timeline of events &#8211; http://beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Timeline of events &#8211; <a href="http://beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/" rel="nofollow">http://beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC Law IPTF Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vermont Brewery Challenged by Monster Energy Drink in Trademark Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7755</link>
		<dc:creator>BC Law IPTF Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vermont Brewery Challenged by Monster Energy Drink in Trademark Dispute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-7755</guid>
		<description>[...] like Hansen who has revenues of around $600 million per year.Monster Problem for Rock Art - WCAX.comTimeline of Dispute - Beernews.orgA True Monster Attacks Rock Art Brewery - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like Hansen who has revenues of around $600 million per year.Monster Problem for Rock Art &#8211; WCAX.comTimeline of Dispute &#8211; Beernews.orgA True Monster Attacks Rock Art Brewery &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7730</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-7730</guid>
		<description>Great timeline.  Thanks for putting this together!

-Lost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great timeline.  Thanks for putting this together!</p>
<p>-Lost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A True Monster Attacks Rock Art Brewery &#8211; Can Twitter and Facebook Help? - Young &#38; Hungry - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.beernews.org/2009/10/timeline-rock-art-vs-monster-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-7719</link>
		<dc:creator>A True Monster Attacks Rock Art Brewery &#8211; Can Twitter and Facebook Help? - Young &#38; Hungry - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7160#comment-7719</guid>
		<description>[...] in even more sordid details on the most recent example of said practices, BeerNews.org has a timeline of events for the scuffle between Monster, Hansen, Anheuser-Busch, and Rock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in even more sordid details on the most recent example of said practices, BeerNews.org has a timeline of events for the scuffle between Monster, Hansen, Anheuser-Busch, and Rock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

